Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Holger Rune vs Michael Mmoh Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rune vs Mmoh analysis and find out who is favored!
Holger Rune vs Michael Mmoh Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rune has won 54.68% of points on his second serve, while Mmoh has won 47.18%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rune, in recent form, has won 49.11% of his opponent's second serve points, while Mmoh has won 48.48%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.61% and 32.18% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rune has saved 68.51% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mmoh has saved 59.76% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rune has won 58.46% of matches played (W/L 38/ 27), with Mmoh winning 53.45% (W/L 31/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rune has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 73% (W/L 60/ 22), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 40/ 35). Mmoh has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 65/ 39), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 11/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Rune has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 67.86% of matches (W/L 19/ 9), where as Mmoh has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 14/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Rune winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Rune winning 4 and Mmoh winning 0. The last match between Rune and Mmoh was at the Abierto Mexicano Telcel - Acapulco, 27-02-2024, First, Hard with Holger Rune getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:47:9.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Rune and Mmoh have played a deciding set 0 times, with Rune winning 0 times and Mmoh 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Rune winning 1, and Mmoh 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rune has played against opponents with an average rank of 138.38 while Mmoh has played against players with an average rank of 236.31.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rune has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mmoh has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rune has converted 34.27% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mmoh has converted 42.78% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Rune 2 - 0 Mmoh
12
Rank
4
High
21
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
116
Rank
81
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
Form
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
66% (224-116)
Career Total W/L
58% (286-207)
66% (19-10)
YTD W/L
40% (8-12)
$5,763,560
Career Prize Money
$1,164,400
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Holger Rune | Michael Mmoh |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 25 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 23 | 10 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 13 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:9 | 1:47:9 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (73/126) | 65% (92/141) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (58/73) | 70% (64/92) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 60% (32/53) | 35% (17/49) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (5/15) | 11% (1/9) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (60/141) | 29% (36/126) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Holger Rune
Player
Michael Mmoh
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
| 7-6(6) 6-4 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Michael Mmoh
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
88)
17
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
7
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
20 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Holger Rune | Michael Mmoh |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 66% (19/10) | 40% (8/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (44/29) | 45% (20/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (375/352) | 49% (204/209) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (10/5) | 30% (3/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) | 50% (2/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | 50% (3/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.54 | 0.53 |
| Aces Total | 192 | 107 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 69 | 62 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:1:6 | 1:44:48 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 177.79 | 172.75 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1423/2332) | 65% (856/1312) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (1044/1423) | 71% (607/856) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (497/909) | 46% (211/456) |
| BPs Won% Total | 34% (61/178) | 44% (47/107) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (810/2279) | 37% (473/1287) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 71% (12/5) | 64% (7/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (1/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (18/27) | 41% (7/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 88% (14/16) | 25% (2/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 64% (7/11) | 20% (1/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (17/16) | 67% (12/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (17/1) | 33% (12/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (12/3) | 0% (8/0) |
Holger Rune Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Luca Nardi
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Holger Rune
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
64%
(
67 of
105)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
22 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Mariano Navone
66%
(
86 of
131)
1st Serve %
69%
(
73 of
106)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
41%
(
54 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
106)
119
Total Points Won
118
|
5-7 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Holger Rune
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Marc-Andrea Huesler
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
20 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Holger Rune
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
95)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
87%
(
46 of
53)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
41 of
50)
68%
(
25 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
19 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Grigor Dimitrov
70%
(
94 of
135)
1st Serve %
63%
(
74 of
117)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
54 of
74)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
53 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
117)
125
Total Points Won
127
|
7-6(9) 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Sumit Nagal
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Holger Rune
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Michael Mmoh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Mayo
Player
Michael Mmoh
43%
(
34 of
80)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Michael Mmoh
72%
(
62 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Michael Mmoh
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve %
63%
(
19 of
30)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
94%
(
16 of
17)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
4 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
31
Total Points Won
24
|
6-3 0-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Max Purcell
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Juan Pablo Varillas
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Michael Mmoh
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
19
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
8
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
104)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabio Fognini
Player
Michael Mmoh
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Michael Mmoh
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
3
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
6
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Michael Mmoh
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 1-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Rune Vs Mmoh Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
